12+ AI models · Feature breakdown · Personalized fixes
From photo to complete facial analysis in four precise stages.
Take a clear front-facing photo with neutral expression. Good lighting and straight-on angle ensure the most accurate 12-feature analysis.
Our AI maps 100+ facial landmarks across your jawline, eyes, nose, lips, brow, skin, and symmetry to build a complete facial profile.
Each feature is scored individually and weighted by importance: jawline (35%), eyes (25%), harmony (15%), skin (10%), and more.
Receive your overall face rating out of 10 with a full breakdown and a prioritized improvement plan targeting your weakest areas first.
Your face rating is calculated from 12 weighted features. Jawline alone drives 35% of your score. Here is the complete methodology:
| # | Feature | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jawline & Chin | 35% |
| 2 | Eye Region & Canthal Tilt | 25% |
| 3 | Facial Harmony & Proportions | 15% |
| 4 | Skin Quality & Complexion | 10% |
| 5 | Face Symmetry | 5% |
| 6 | Nose Shape & Size | 4% |
| 7 | Lip Fullness & Shape | 3% |
| 8 | Brow Position & Shape | 1.5% |
| 9 | Golden Ratio Compliance | 1% |
| 10 | Hairline & Forehead | 0.5% |
| 11 | Overall Masculinity / Femininity | 0.5% |
| 12 | Mouth & Smile Aesthetics | 0.5% |
See how the weighted breakdown works across different face types. Each score reveals specific strengths and improvement paths.
Strong base. Eye region is the limiting factor — canthal tilt improvement would boost to ~8.0
Jawline is the bottleneck. Masseter training + body recomposition could add 1.5+ points
Elite face. Skin quality is the only drag — retinoid routine would push to 8.8+
Balanced but no standout features. Focus on jawline definition and eye area to create contrast
Great bone structure. Canthal tilt is slightly limiting — canthopexy or brow lowering would unlock 8.5+
Fat percentage is masking good structure. Recomposition alone could yield 2+ point gain
Your face rating comes with a prioritized action plan. Here is the ROI on each intervention, starting with highest leverage:
Lowering body fat reveals existing bone structure. Jawline definition improves dramatically at 12-15% body fat for most men.
Masseter hypertrophy (chewing), jawline grooming, neck posture. Jawline is 35% of your total score.
Canthal tilt improvement, brow lowering, eyelid skincare, scleral show reduction via lower eyelid tightening.
Retinoid, vitamin C, SPF, and hydration. Skin quality is 10% of score and noticeable in all lighting.
Strategic beard to fix weak jaw or chin. Must be styled to your face shape for maximum effect.
Forward head posture weakens jawline appearance. Chin tucks and cervical spine alignment help.
Canthoplasty, jaw implants, rhinoplasty. Last resort after exhausting all non-surgical options.
7-8 hours sleep and 2-3L water daily maintain skin clarity, reduce eye bags, improve overall appearance.
Your face rating is just the start. Each feature score links to a specialized analyzer with deeper measurements and targeted improvement protocols.
Measures jaw width, gonial angle, chin projection, and mandible symmetry — your highest-weighted feature.
Classifies hunter vs prey eyes, measures tilt angle (+5° hunter), assesses eye region attractiveness.
Evaluates face third ratios, intercanthal distance, and overall proportion balance.
Detects acne, redness, pigmentation, texture issues, and skin age. Quantifies complexion quality.
Measures bilateral asymmetry across eyes, brows, cheekbones, and jaw.
Checks your face against the 1:1.618 golden ratio across 12 key facial measurements.
Scores smile width, tooth show, lip symmetry, and attractiveness of your smile dynamics.
Recommends beard styles optimized for your face shape to enhance jaw and lower third.
Quantifies acne severity, spot density, and provides targeted skincare recommendations.
Monitors facial structure changes from proper tongue posture over weeks and months.
Compares your overall facial attractiveness against a peer percentile. Competitive benchmark.
AI finds the best hairstyle for your face shape, hairline, and forehead proportions.
Facial attractiveness research has converged on three universal pillars: averageness, symmetry, and sexual dimorphism. Rhodes (2006) demonstrated that faces closer to the population average are consistently rated more attractive across cultures — not because average is boring, but because averageness signals genetic health and developmental stability. Our AI rating system incorporates this by comparing each feature against population distributions rather than an arbitrary ideal.
The halo effect is the psychological phenomenon where attractive individuals are subconsciously attributed with positive personality traits — intelligence, competence, trustworthiness. A meta-analysis by Langlois et al. (2000) found that attractive faces receive preferential treatment across hiring, social, and legal contexts. This is not superficial bias; it is an evolved heuristic. Our face rating captures the structural component of this effect — the objective bone and tissue geometry that drives the halo response.
Sexual dimorphism is where male and female attractiveness diverge most sharply. For men, testosterone-mediated features — wider jaw, prominent brow ridge, deeper eye sockets with positive canthal tilt — directly predict perceived dominance and attractiveness. Perrett et al. (1998) showed that masculinized male faces are rated as more attractive for short-term relationships, while slightly feminized male faces score higher for long-term. Our weighting system (jawline 35%, eyes 25%) reflects this: male facial attractiveness is disproportionately driven by bone structure markers of androgen exposure.
The golden ratio (1:1.618) has been linked to facial attractiveness since antiquity, but modern research gives it a nuanced role. Pallett et al. (2010) found that while certain facial proportions near the golden ratio are preferred, strict golden ratio compliance is neither necessary nor sufficient for an attractive face. Our model treats golden ratio compliance as a small signal (1% weight) within the broader harmony (15%) category — present in some attractive faces but not a requirement.
Machine learning models trained on thousands of human-rated faces now achieve 70-80% agreement with human judges. These models learn feature interactions that even trained human raters miss: for example, the non-linear relationship between jaw width and perceived masculinity, or the interaction between canthal tilt and eyelid hooding. Our 12-feature weighted system combines this AI capability with transparent, explainable scoring — you do not just get a number, you get a complete anatomical breakdown with a prioritized roadmap to improve it.
Your face rating identifies your weak areas. Now go deeper with dedicated analyzers for each feature — detailed scores, anatomical measurements, and targeted protocols.